Same old conclusion ...

We have now harnessed hi-tech means to conclude what Baron Auckland concluded in 1771, namely that incarceration is not wise punishment:



Finding Work: A Smartphone Study of Job Searching, Social Contacts, and Wellbeing after Prison

Author: 

Naomi F. Sugie

Sponsoring Agency: 

National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America

Format: 

Document ; Document (Online)

Document URL: 

PDF   

Publication Date: 

September 2014

Pages: 

171

Type: 

Report (Grant Sponsored)

Origin: 

United States of America

Language: 

English

Grant No.: 

2013-IJ-CX-0007

Annotation: 

This study examined parolee efforts and attitudes to finding work, obstacles to finding work, and subsequent work experiences after reentry in Newark, New Jersey.

Abstract: 

The immediate months after prison are critical and can determine future trajectories of successful reintegration or recidivism. Finding employment after prison is considered a key condition to prevent recidivism; however, these individuals face numerous obstacles to finding work. Methodological difficulties prevent a thorough understanding of how these challenges impact job searching and working experiences of individuals after reentry. Using an innovative data collection method this dissertation contributes a detailed portrait of the job searching and working trajectories of 156 individuals. Participants were randomly sampled from a complete census of all recent releases to parole in Newark, New Jersey, and were followed for three months. Utilizing these data, the dissertation analyzes: a) the searching and working experiences of individuals at reentry, b) the use of social contacts for finding employment, and c) the association between emotional wellbeing and job searching. The manuscript also includes a methodological chapter, which describes the strengths and potential challenges of using smartphones as a data collection tool. Analyses of detailed smartphone measures reveal a reentry period characterized by very short-term, irregular, and poor-quality work. There is substantial heterogeneity across searching and working patterns, where older and less advantaged individuals sustained high levels of job searching throughout the study period. In contrast to prevailing notions, individuals are not social isolates or deeply distraught about their job searches; rather, they are highly connected to others and feel happier while searching for work. These results indicate that the low employment rates of reentering individuals are not due to person-specific deficiencies. Reentering individuals, however, remain deeply disadvantaged in the labor market, where they compete for work within a structure of reduced and limited opportunities. These findings challenge the established idea that finding suitable employment in today’s labor market is an attainable goal for reentering individuals.

Popular posts from this blog

A "Get Out of Jail Free Card" Will Not Work    Most of America's prison reform advocates only approach the issues from the standpoint of the prisoner-as-victim.  Law enforcement policies under the prevailing liberal view are characterized as the main cause and perpetrator of mass incarceration.  We rarely hear these folks tell us what punishment the guilty should have or how criminals should accept the consequences of their crimes.  Many times they propose drug treatment, Drug Court, therapy, commitment to mental institutions, rehabilitation, "alternative sentences," and the extremely general solutions of fairness, equality, education and "community corrections."  Most critics of mass incarceration focus on the process, not the substance of the problems.     The process is flawed, they say, because of the failed War on Drugs, inadequate indigent defense, excessive prosecutorial power, mandatory sentences, exce...
Read more

Who is Biased Against Prison and Sentencing Reform?

Who is Biased Against Prison and Sentencing Reform? by John Dewar Gleissner More people than you think.   Private prison company bias is a no-brainer.   So is the opposition from labor unions for correctional officers.   Politicians naturally do not wish to appear soft on crime, because otherwise they lose their jobs.   Not many prisoners vote or are in the right place to vote.   Some communities need the jobs prisons provide.   The public is biased about crime generally, and believes crime rates are going up when they are actually going down.   Many want prison to be tough and scary.   Crime victims are not too worried about terrible prison conditions, and who can blame them?   Taxpayers are not inclined to spend money on prisons.   Prison walls and fences naturally block the flow of information, commerce and visitors.   Educated, law-abiding and intelligent people do not have much in common with prisoners, and are thus...
Read more

HOW TO CREATE AMERICAN MANUFACTURING JOBS

"How to Create American Manufacturing Jobs" has been published and released by the Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy , a publication of the University of Tennessee Law School.  Citation: Vol. 9 - Issue 2, Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy 161 (Fall 2013), now available on Westlaw.  For those who do not have access to Westlaw, here is a summary: Right now, 50 states and the federal government (not to mention city and county jails) have total control over every single aspect of prison industries.  Total control must give way to more contractual and trade freedom of action.  The United States could create many manufacturing jobs if they would free employers, prisoners and Departments of Correction to manufacture goods in prison free of almost all government employment laws and regulations, and subject to contracts between willing prisoners and willing private manufacturers, who must also contract with the prison systems for space and other accommodatio...
Read more